Experimental design and testing of a pneumatic propulsion system for maritime transportation
Experimental design and testing of a pneumatic propulsion system for maritime transportation
Research paper
Experimental design and testing of a pneumatic propulsion system for maritime transportation
Highlights
- •
Experimental rig built for testing pneumatic propulsion system for ferry boats.
- •
System compared to electrically driven motor used in maritime propulsion.
- •
The pneumatic system outperformed the electric system technically, economically and environmentally.
- •
Pneumatic system has pronounced advantages for fixed-route transporation
Abstract
Although the transportation sector is the backbone of economic exchange and social growth, it remains a major contributor to pollution and adverse emissions. Maritime transportation is a booming sector in coastal cities such as Dubai and the United Arab Emirates. Apart from being a tourist attraction, it also relieves a small portion of transportation congestion. Conventional boats use engines that operate on diesel and are thus responsible for air and waterborne pollution that severely harms marine wildlife and raises the concentrations of poisonous and carcinogenic materials in the water. In this paper, an alternative propulsion method is proposed in the form of a pneumatically powered boat. The system is powered by an air motor-mounted propeller fed by an onboard compressed air tank(s). In contrast to typical propulsion systems, compressed air systems offer effective, clean, and sustainable propulsion systems. The system performance was analyzed and compared with that of an electrical propulsion system powered by electrochemical batteries. In addition, a life cycle analysis was conducted to quantify any reduction in carbon dioxide emissions due to the utilization of the pneumatic system. The experimental results proved that compressed air is an effective alternative to electrical motors in terms of eco-friendliness, effectiveness, and sustainability. The pneumatic system provided a 6% extra propulsion force and a carbon footprint saving of 307 kgCO2/year over their electrical counterparts. Pneumatic systems offer a real advantage over other propulsion methods for ferryboat applications, which are defined by a constant trip length and path.
Introduction
Maritime transportation is an essential part of the global transportation network and facilitates a significant share of commercial and economic activities (Fratila et al., 2021). Over 90% of global trade in terms of quantity and over 70% in terms of value is carried out through maritime transportation channels (Scarbrough Ricardo et al., 2022). Compared with air and land transport, shipping is a more economically viable and environmentally friendly option. Nevertheless, the fossil fuel propulsion systems often employed in maritime transport encounter a range of critical issues. The foremost concern is their significant contribution to marine pollution by releasing pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter into the air and water. These emissions not only degrade the air quality along coastlines but also harm marine ecosystems (Andersson et al., 2016). Moreover, carbon dioxide emitted by these systems accelerates ocean acidification and drives climate change, resulting in rising sea levels and unpredictable weather patterns that pose substantial challenges to maritime operations and coastal communities. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), after a sharp decline in 2020, emissions from the global shipping industry will increase by 5% by 2021, surpassing 2015 levels (UNCTAD, 2022). Reliance on finite fossil fuel reserves further exposes the maritime industry to supply chain vulnerabilities and price fluctuations. To overcome these issues, the transition toward cleaner alternatives, such as advanced propulsion technologies and sustainable energy sources, has been at the core of research.
Electrical propulsion systems are promising for sustainable maritime transportation. Renowned for zero emissions at the point of use and reduced noise levels, electric motors offer compelling environmental benefits. Moreover, their inherent efficiency and precise control over thrust and speed contribute to enhanced performance, maneuverability, and operational advantages. The flexibility of being powered by diverse energy sources, including renewables, further positions electric propulsion as a key player in decarbonizing maritime transport. Electrical propulsion systems are characterized by their flexible arrangement, which reduces the space requirements for the engine room. As a result, it is possible to increase the deadweight while simultaneously reducing the levels of vibration and noise, as well as the associated maintenance expenses (Kim et al., 2007). Electric propulsion systems offer significant advantages in terms of enhancing efficiency and ship design compared to conventional propulsion systems, including improved prime mover efficiency, improved propulsor efficiency, reduced radiated noise and vibration, and enhanced reliability and survivability (Nuchturee et al., 2020). Although electrical propulsion offers multiple benefits, it presents several significant challenges. An example is the low power density of the utilized batteries compared to other energy storage devices, such as supercapacitors (Yasin et al., 2024), which impacts the operational feasibility. Moreover, battery degradation over time requires costly replacements and raises concerns related to the ecological impact on the end-of-life of the battery. Environmental considerations span the resource demands of battery production and their disposal (Ammar and Seddiek, 2021).
Hybrid propulsion systems have been proposed to overcome these shortcomings. These systems combine conventional fuel-based propulsion with renewable energy sources to reduce expenses and emissions and improve overall performance. Diesel-electric propulsion has the potential to be flexible and efficient. Using electric motors to power a ship’s propellers simplifies the adjustment of the ship’s speed and direction and allows the system to be fine-tuned for optimal efficiency considering the vessel’s operational parameters (Zaccone et al., 2021). Some hybrid propulsion systems utilize this approach to enhance efficiency and reduce emissions by integrating it with other technologies, such as wind, solar, or battery power (Dedes et al., 2016), (Nüesch et al., 2014), (Fontaras et al., 2008). Consequently, employing multiple energy sources optimizes the power generation of maritime transport, thereby enhancing its capability to achieve high efficiency. Consequently, recent research has explored hybrid propulsion systems for maritime transportation. For instance, Dedes et al. (2016) examined the use of a diesel-battery hybrid propulsion system in a large oceanic bulk carrier. The results showed that the efficiency of the system increased considerably. Consequently, fuel usage decreased by approximately 2%–3%, and CO2 and NOx emissions decreased by approximately 5%–7%. Similarly, Boumann et al. (Bouman et al., 2017) reported that hybrid propulsion systems can reduce CO2 emissions by 2%–45%. Further, a study by Sciberras et al. (2015) introduced a hybrid propulsion system for ships and found that fuel usage and emissions decreased by 44%. In addition, Baccioli et al. (2021) investigated a diesel marine engine with a molten carbonate fuel cell propulsion system. The authors used CO2 emissions generated by a diesel engine to run a fuel cell. Consequently, the efficiencies increased by 0.8% and 4.9%, respectively, based on the specific system configuration.
In short-trip maritime transportation, pneumatic propulsion systems that utilize compressed air to generate thrust offer distinct advantages over conventional fossil-fuel systems. These systems utilize the expansion of compressed air to generate motion. Compressed air is utilized in many applications such as energy storage (Alami et al., 2022a), cooling (Alami et al., 2022b), (Alami et al., 2023), and cogeneration (Vieira et al., 2021). Their environmental benefits and low-carbon footprint stem from their reliance on clean and abundant compressed air, promising reduced emissions and pollution, which are critical for preserving marine ecosystems (Fang et al., 2021). In addition, the simplicity of pneumatic systems translates to lower maintenance costs and enhanced reliability, which are essential factors for harsh marine environments. Moreover, their capability of instant power and acceleration makes them suitable for scenarios requiring rapid bursts of speed. Alami et al. (2021) assessed the technical feasibility of an all-air vehicle. The experimental results showed great potential for the utilization of such vehicles with speeds reaching 14 km/h and a power of 0.7 hp at a pressure of 5 bar. Another compressed air vehicle showed adequate and economic performance with a work output of 1.014 kW and a torque of 11 N ∙ m at a pressure of 9 bar (Xu et al., 2021a). Ramasubramanian et al. (2021) studied the performance of a pneumatic compressed-air system with various vane angles and casing sizes. The experimental results indicate an average running time of 7 h at a pressure of 3 atm. Pneumatic motors are also used in hybrid propulsion systems. For example, an auxiliary pneumatic motor exhibits an energy efficiency of 62% and contributes a power value of 0.4 kW (Xu et al., 2021b).
This study introduces a novel approach to maritime propulsion, focusing on the use of pneumatic systems, particularly in ferry boats. Unlike most existing studies that focus on electrical or hybrid propulsion, this study explores the benefits of pneumatic motors, which are known for their rapid response, durability, and ease of adoption in existing vessels. An experimental rig was constructed to compare the performance of this setup with that of an electrical propulsion system powered by electrochemical batteries (lead-acid). The main objective is to compare the thrust forces produced by the two systems using a load cell. This study reports the effects of varying the pressurized air tank capacity, pressure, and discharge rate on the thrust force. In addition, a lifecycle analysis was conducted to examine the environmental impact and energy consumption of both propulsion systems, thereby computing any reduction in carbon dioxide emissions achieved using the pneumatic system. This study paves the way for the adoption of renewable and sustainable maritime transportation systems by positioning pneumatic motors as practical, effective, clean, and sustainable alternatives to traditional propulsion systems.
Section snippets
Experimental setup
The forces acting on a boat while navigating under dynamic water conditions are shown in Fig. 1. The two horizontal forces acting on the vessel are the thrust and drag forces if the vessel is to move. In this setup, the drag force is replaced by the tension in the cable, leading to a load cell. Under static conditions, the tension force is equal to the thrust (Ploé, 2018) (Besana, 2015).
The drag force (FD) acted in the same direction as the free-stream flow. The equation for the drag force is
Operational results
The propulsion force as a function of time is plotted in Fig. 4 (a) and (b) for pneumatic population case PM-4 and electric propulsion system case EM-1, respectively. The data were collected at a sampling frequency of 60 Hz and exhibited noticeable noise. To enhance the data accuracy, noise within the data was reduced by employing a second-order filter. Fig. 4 shows an example of the original and filtered data. The filtered data were then used to establish a third-order polynomial curve. The
Conclusion and future recommendations
In this study, a comprehensive investigation was conducted to assess the feasibility of utilizing pneumatic propulsion driven by a compressed-air system in a ferryboat. The performance of the pneumatic propulsion system was compared with that of an electrically based (battery) propulsion system by measuring the tension force exerted by the boat on a load cell. In addition, an LCA was conducted to determine the environmental impacts of both propulsion systems. The experimental results indicate
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Abdul Hai Alami: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Ahmad Yasin: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Adnan Alashkar: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Rashid Alrashid: Investigation. Ayman Mdallal: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Mohamad Ayoub: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Shamma Alasad: Writing – review & editing,
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (32)
- et al.
Technical feasibility of a pneumatically driven vehicle
Sci. Total Environ.
(2021)
Experimental evaluation of compressed air energy storage as a potential replacement of electrochemical batteries
J. Energy Storage
(2022)
Expansion cooling prospects for large scale applications
International Journal of Thermofluids
(2023)- et al.
Hybridization of an internal combustion engine with a molten carbonate fuel cell for marine applications
Appl. Energy
(2021) - et al.
State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping–A review
Transp Res D Transp Environ
(2017) - et al.
Investigation of Diesel Hybrid systems for fuel oil reduction in slow speed ocean going ships
Energy
(2016) - et al.
A review of compressed air energy systems in vehicle transport
Energy Strategy Rev.
(2021) - et al.
Experimental evaluation of hybrid vehicle fuel economy and pollutant emissions over real-world simulation driving cycles
Atmos. Environ.
(2008) - et al.
Energy efficiency of integrated electric propulsion for ships – a review
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2020)
Optimal energy management for a diesel hybrid electric vehicle considering transient PM and quasi-static NOx emissions
Control Eng. Pract.
(2014)- et al.
Design and development of pneumatic compressed air vehicle
Mater. Today Proc.
(2021) - et al.
Applications of compressed air energy storage in cogeneration systems
Energy
(2021)
Experimental research on universal characteristics and output performance of pneumatic motor for compressed air vehicle
J. Energy Storage
(2021)
Experimental investigation of pneumatic motor for transport application
Renew. Energy
(2021)-
Review of maritime transport 2022, UNCTAD
Cooling potential for hot climates by utilizing thermal management of compressed air energy storage systems
Sci. Rep.
(2022)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.